iShruti
iShruti
CISOs, red-teamers, and researchers. No vendor pitch. Real prices upfront, shortlist in 24 hours.
AI has rewritten both sides of the security equation at once — and most organizations are hearing about only half of it. We curate speakers who can address all three fronts of AI and cybersecurity: how attackers now use AI, how defenders are deploying it, and how to secure the AI systems your own organization is racing to adopt.
The security keynote circuit is crowded with vendors pitching a product wrapped in a threat narrative. Our speakers are practitioners — CISOs, security researchers, red-teamers, and threat-intelligence leaders — who give an audience an honest, vendor-neutral picture of the AI-era threat landscape and what actually reduces risk.
We serve CISOs and their teams, boards and audit committees, security conferences, and enterprise leaders who now have to treat AI-driven cyber risk as a board-level concern rather than a purely technical one. The adversary has upgraded; the briefing your leadership gets should be upgraded to match it.
Someone from the real front line.
Not a product pitch in a threat costume. These are CISOs, researchers, and red-teamers giving the vendor-neutral picture — priced upfront, shortlisted in 24 hours.
AI industrialized the attack: flawless phishing, deepfake voices, automated vulnerability discovery. The threat you faced two years ago is gone.
SOCs are racing to automate triage — signal volume outstripped humans long ago. AI defense has failure modes too.
Securing AI itself is a new discipline: prompt injection, data poisoning, agent hijacking — mostly unmapped.
Cyber risk is now a board and disclosure issue. The bridge from technical to boardroom is the rare skill.
The AI threat landscape: how attackers are using AI right now
Deepfakes, voice clones, and the end of “seeing is believing” in security
AI in the SOC: automating detection and response without losing the humans
Securing AI systems: prompt injection, data poisoning, and agent hijacking
The CISO's guide to AI governance and board-level cyber risk
Adversarial AI: attacking and defending machine-learning systems
Identity in the age of generative AI: rethinking authentication and trust
AI-powered social engineering and the evolving insider threat
Building an AI-ready security program
Red-teaming AI: stress-testing models and agents before attackers do
AI vs. AI: when both sides of the fight are automated
Your first AI security assessment: mapping the new attack surface
Need a different angle? Every talk is customized to your audience.
Hire a speakerIn-person, on your main stage.
Remote keynote or fireside.
Multi-voice sessions.
One price, our 17.5% printed inside it. Travel at cost, capped. No surprise line-items — ask any bureau to show you theirs. Condensed board briefings with facilitated discussion are a favorite security format — ask us.
2 minutes, no account
verified speakers, real prices, in 24 hours
contracts, payment, and logistics handled
Five questions every organizer asks — tap one.
A CISO or security executive is usually stronger for leadership and board audiences, translating AI threats into risk and governance terms. A researcher or red-teamer tends to be stronger for technical audiences who want depth on attack techniques and defenses. For a mixed audience, look for someone who can move fluently between the two registers.
Watch a full recorded talk and read the speaker's recent writing. Vendor-neutral practitioners describe the threat landscape and the trade-offs of different defenses without steering everything toward one product. If every problem in the talk resolves to a single tool, treat it as marketing. We prioritize independent, practitioner voices.
Yes, and it is worth being explicit about which you need. "AI for security" (using AI to defend) and "security for AI" (protecting models and agents) are related but distinct topics. As your organization deploys AI, the second is increasingly urgent. Tell us which emphasis your audience needs.
Yes — and it is often overdue. Boards now carry oversight responsibility for cyber risk, and AI has materially changed that risk. For board audiences, choose a speaker who leads with business impact, governance, and disclosure implications rather than deep technical detail, and consider a shorter briefing-plus-discussion format.
Fees vary by the speaker's profile, seniority, and format. Our platform shows each speaker's fee range transparently, with a flat 17.5% platform fee and no hidden markups, so you can align the engagement with your budget.
Rather we just figure it out for you?
Get a shortlist$10K–$30K for most events; virtual from $2,500. The price you see is the whole price — our 17.5% is printed inside it.
We individually check identity, real work, and stage skill. Every speaker. No exceptions.
Yes — the security of models and agents, including prompt injection, data poisoning, and agent misuse, is a fast-emerging niche we source for specifically. We can prioritize speakers with genuine depth in AI system security.
Yes. Many security leaders on our roster are comfortable in a condensed board or executive-briefing format, pairing a short briefing with facilitated discussion of your organization's specific risk posture.
Yes. As cyber-incident disclosure expectations tighten, we source for speakers who can connect AI-era threats to governance, compliance, and disclosure obligations, not just technical defense.
Yes. Most of our speakers offer virtual and hybrid formats, which work well for distributed security teams and global briefings.